🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive policy to ban social media access for young people below 16 is sending ripples around the globe. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and guardians are observing with great interest to see if this approach will set a precedent for other nations.

European Movement

Across Europe, a growing chorus of nations are moving toward parallel bans.

• Denmark plans a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister declaring that phones and apps are "robbing our children's youth". Legislation could be passed soon.
• Norway is set to introduce a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to shield young people from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• The Irish government is developing a digital wallet to authenticate the user details of social media users. Authorities have stated that an Australian-model ban is "a potential options on the table".
• In Spain, the president has asked lawmakers to enact a proposal increasing the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a parliamentary commission has endorsed a similar step, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has urged parents to restrict their youngsters from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has passed a non-binding motion demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 without parental consent is granted. While it highlights of the "addictive" design of these services, the step does not establish binding law.

"A strong age barrier is a solid foundation," said a leading MEP driving the measure.

Britain: A Watchful Eye

For the United Kingdom, the administration has not ruled out a potential ban, arguing that "no measure is discarded" but maintaining any policy must be "supported by strong data".

Last year, momentum built behind a bill to enact controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was ultimately watered down. Instead, the administration vowed to investigate the matter.

Advocacy groups have voiced apprehensions. One foundation established by the loved ones of a young person who took her own life after viewing dangerous online content suggests that a simple age ban might not make platforms safer and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of exposure when young people reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a response to the inability of the tech sector to design tools that are secure and fit for young users," said a influential online safety campaigner.

America: A Decentralized Landscape

Across America, action is mostly unfolding at the local government level against a backdrop of country-wide stalemate.

• Utah demands adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and limits overnight use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a bill barring under-14s from joining social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• Virginia has passed a regulation limiting minors to a single hour of social media access per day, with extra use dependent on parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly introduced laws mandating guardian approval for teenagers to set up social media presences.

Despite widespread concern and proposals from certain politicians to copy Australia's lead, a US-wide ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

International Perspectives

Apart from the West, additional countries are similarly taking action.

• Malaysia intends to prohibit social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• Brazil has increased the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, international agencies strike a more cautious position. A major UN agency has warned that social media bans pose dangers and "could prove counterproductive". The organization notes that social networks can be a "lifeline" for isolated children and that bans should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to prioritize user protection.

While this worldwide discussion continues, the policies of Australia and several other countries show that governments internationally are increasingly prepared to stand by for the industry to make changes on their own.