🔗 Share this article

I possess a few thoughts about that remarks made by ESPN commentator a well-known announcer after Novak Djokovic's victory over Taylor Fritz in the US Open last eight. Look – Fritz is the United States, Fowler is American – and sports frequently lend themselves to nationalism. Some disappointment would have been understandable. Rather, Fowler invoked the ongoing absence of American men at grand slam tournaments: none of them has won a title since the last American champion in 2003, and Fritz had been the final representative in the competition.

Everyone love a narrative, me too. But really. Suppose Fritz defeated the legend for the initial occasion, force of nature Carlos Alcaraz was waiting in the following match, who Fritz has yet to beat in an competitive encounter. And if he’d someway gotten past that, it would have been defending champion the Italian, against whom the American had dropped 10 of the previous eleven sets. Alcaraz and Sinner had also divided the previous seven major titles (plus the Spaniard proceeded to defeat a tired Serbian in the subsequent match). He stated in post-match interviews following his defeat that he in fact preferred his path, because it presented the opportunity to defeat the top three players in the world in succession. He is more than within his right to aim for the accomplishment; an competitor is meant to believe in themselves. But entering that Djokovic quarter-final what other person in their right mind had the drought of American champions on the brain?

Coco Gauff’s second serve the only thing standing in her way and consistent victories

The American, 28, is ranked fourth in the world starting the upcoming ATP World Tour Finals and has won his previous six encounters over third-ranked Alexander Zverev with increasing ease. It's likely he might take that spot for himself in the coming years. But evidently that at present, that’s as high as he can climb: The Italian and Spaniard sit a chasm of ranking points away. His top-class delivery and powerful strength on each forehand and reverse side are sufficiently enough to defeat most opponents on the professional circuit. Against the handful of generational talents, though, he is often overmatched. The past few seasons has seen the interesting emergence of lanky, towering athletes who can nonetheless cover the court with the surprising quickness and grace of smaller men. He is 6ft 5ins and looks it. His movement is rigid, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his legs. So he’ll rarely win a rally that the other player was dictating, and playing a drop shot against him is usually a reliable tactic. That serves as a pretty harsh restriction on his potential.

The American has achieved a number of significant, unexpected advancements over the years. At the beginning of the decade, he was hovering around the lower end of the top 30. 24 months later, he was sniffing the elite ten. Last year, he unexpectedly surged up to No 4 – and maintained the spot. But the subsequent step, mixing it up with and defeating all-time-greats like Alcaraz, Sinner, and including a declining Djokovic, is the highest of all. What could the commentator thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a serious threat to beat them all back-to-back? That it was worth commenting on the continuing drought of US male players winning grand slams when he had exited the US Open in the quarter-finals? The desperation is simply excessive and the respect for the difficulty of the challenge too little.

Taylor Fritz achieved a personal best run to the All England Club semi-finals in July.

Fritz’s play in that exact quarter-final should have been enough of an indication. Djokovic won in four sets, a victory that only felt uncertain for moments towards the conclusion, when the American had survived a couple match points and had a opportunity to maintain serve for 5-5. The pair appeared well-balanced during the rallies, with the American earning plenty of opportunities to win the opponent's serve. But Djokovic rescued service break opportunity after service break opportunity, extending the run to the point of agony. When he eventually did convert one of the opportunities at 5-5 in the second set, he immediately produced a horrendous service game to drop serve once more; Djokovic had drawn him into a battle secondary to the real battle and compelled him to expend far too much energy to prevail. Facing match points in the final game, his primary delivery sailed to heaven. He prolonged the match two times on his second serve, but finally committed two errors. It wasn’t a choke, in my opinion, just a consequence of needing to hit too many second serves.

The contest was quite compelling proof that Fritz is not good enough to defeat any form of Djokovic, who was defeated by the Spaniard in the next round and did not especially appeared like he thought he could win. This is perfectly acceptable – the Serbian is the greatest of all time, and might not be at the height of his physical powers anymore, but has developed enough experience and strategic intelligence to make up for a significant portion of the decline. The issue is the individuals who were expecting the American to win, and pressuring him to achieve that, when he was had not accomplished anything that suggested he could.

Fritz is an asset to the tour nonetheless. He’s a patient, reflective voice in press conferences, more so than almost everyone on the ATP except for the Russian star, prepared to not just express his emotions or the strategy he believed decided a contest, but explain it. That he ought to bear the brunt of the responsibility for the United States failing to spawn a male major champion since the last American titlist seems unfair. (Since Ben Shelton is competing alongside him in the standings, perhaps they can divide that burden.)

Year-End Championships: Player Divisions

Jimmy Connors Division

• The Spanish phenom
• Taylor Fritz (US)
• The Australian speedster
• Lorenzo Musetti (It)

Swedish icon Group

• Jannik Sinner (It)
• The German powerhouse
• The rising American
• The Canadian talent

“I would likely think about it indefinitely if I fail to do it,” Fritz informed a journalist in June of claiming a grand slam. It is hoped he realizes that he’s not a failure if he doesn’t achieve that objective, that breaking through the Spanish and Italian's young, terrifying empire is actually extremely unlikely for everybody else. {