🔗 Share this article

Through a unattributed ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court has allowed Texas to employ a redrawn congressional boundary scheme that could add several five additional conservative-tilting districts. The six-to-three ruling, released on Thursday, upholds a petition by the state to set aside a federal judge's block that had struck down the new map in November.

Justices' Explanation

The federal judge erroneously placed itself into an active primary campaign, generating considerable confusion and disturbing the fine equilibrium in elections, the order stated in explaining its decision.

The district court had previously found that Texas had likely classified voters based on their race – a method known as racial gerrymandering – when it passed the new maps. It had mandated the state to use the boundaries drawn after the last decennial survey for the next year's election.

Stinging Dissent

With a sharply worded dissenting opinion, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the majority's decision. She contended that it disrespected the work of the district court, pointing out that its ruling was written by a judge selected by ex-President Donald Trump.

While our court is superior in jurisdiction, we are not superior in making these fact-intensive determinations, Kagan stated in a dissent co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

The justice went on, The majority's order solidifies that Texas's new map, with all its boosted partisan advantage, will govern next year's elections. And it means that many Texas residents, without justification, will be grouped in electoral districts because of their race. And that result, as this court has pronounced year in and year out, is a violation of the U.S. Constitution.

National Map-Drawing Struggle

The court's action occurs during a nationwide contest over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is a key piece in pushes to reshape the U.S. House map to protect a slim Republican majority. Ordinarily, map-drawing happens after a ten-year survey. Yet the decision by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a brazen off-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer set off a series of events among other states.

Conservative legislators in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also passed redistricting plans that could add a number of more GOP-friendly seats. Democratic lawmakers, meanwhile, have responded with revised boundaries in states like California and Virginia, which could offset those potential gains.

Political Responses

Lone Star State AG hailed the supreme court ruling. In a statement, he said the order protected Texas's basic authority to draw a map that secures electoral outcomes favorable to the GOP. We are setting the precedent for restoring our country, through each electoral district and individual state, he stated.

In contrast, opposition party representatives criticized the ruling. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the head of a major party campaign committee.

A top House figure argued the court had once again eroded its credibility by upholding a race-based map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he added.