Chemical Companies Owned by Billionaire Jim Ratcliffe Received As Much As £70m in British State Aid In the Past Four Years
Before this week's £50m government bailout for its Scottish plant, chemical companies controlled by billionaire Sir Jim Ratcliffe had already been granted as much as £70m in UK state aid during the previous four-year period.
Recent Revelations and Financial Support
According to official data published this week, state aid to Ratcliffe's chemical empire in the last year alone ranged from £16m and £38m. Since August 2022, the company has received a total of £28m and £70m.
Authorities intervened on Tuesday to grant Ineos with £50m to prop up its Scottish ethylene plant, fearing that without it the UK would cease to have its sole facility manufacturing ethylene—a vital feedstock for plastics. Officials additionally supported a £75m loan guarantee, while Ineos committed to invest £30m of its private capital.
Refinery Shutdown and Wider Challenges
This intervention comes after Ineos closed the adjacent oil refinery in late 2024, costing 400 jobs—a move described as a significant setback to the area and a challenge for the government.
The billionaire, with an estimated net worth of $14.5bn, is understood to have requested government assistance in October. This appeal coincides with the expansive Ineos group, controlled by the 73-year-old, has faced significant financial pressure, partly due to soaring energy costs following Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine.
Reflecting increasing concern over its ability to manage debt, the credit rating agency lowered Ineos's credit rating in September. Ratcliffe has also had to commit significant funds into his Ineos Grenadier automotive project and the turnaround of the football club, in which he holds a minority stake.
Form of Support and Company Statements
The majority of the earlier government support was delivered in the form of tax relief in return for “voluntary agreements to reduce energy use and CO2 output.” The value of these relief schemes for Ineos's plants in Grangemouth and Hull are reported as ranges rather than precise figures.
An Ineos representative stated the aid did not constitute “favourable terms” for the company, but was “awarded against strict criteria, and available to any UK business that qualifies.”
Although Ratcliffe publicly welcomed the £50m support in an announcement, Ineos also released more critical comments. In these, the industrialist launched a broadside against government policy, specifically carbon taxes levied on industrial users.
“The answer is NOT decarbonisation by deindustrialisation,” Ratcliffe wrote. “Without a strong manufacturing base, the economy will falter. High energy costs and punitive carbon charges are driving industry out of the UK at an unsustainable pace.”
In further comments, Ratcliffe described carbon taxes as “an extremely foolish levy in the world,” arguing they put UK plants at a disadvantage against international competitors. Currently, most chemicals and plastics are excluded from the UK's planned carbon import tax.
Future Sustainability Claims
The Ineos spokesperson added: “Ineos has invested over £400m at Grangemouth in the last five years to maintain its status as one of the most productive chemical plants in Europe and to safeguard skilled jobs. The UK chemicals sector has had a very difficult year, yet everyone relies on this industry every day. Should we fail to manufacture these essential materials in the UK, they are imported instead, often from higher-carbon production abroad.”
A senior Ineos executive, head of sustainability for the company's chemicals unit, said the new funding would be used to enhance energy efficiency, cut carbon emissions, and boost plant performance.
He explained the site, which uses an ethylene cracker running on North Sea gas and imported liquefied petroleum gas, had been under “extreme pressure” from surging energy costs and the UK's carbon taxes.
Records show that Ineos has in the past obtained significant tax breaks from the EU, worth hundreds of millions of euros—notably while Ratcliffe was a prominent backer of the campaign for the UK to leave the EU.